Nigel, how were the firebox tubes rolled back in the good old days? Did they have a smaller air motor to fit in the firebox or what? (Looks like it is really coming along nicely...)
#1 C Kronenwetter on 2013-04-14 15:07
OK. This puts me in my place ! Recognize my comments as the whining of an elderly office worker doing this once or twice a week !!. I suspect that many who did this in the "good" old days would have been !*!* glad to even have an air motor. If you were using an air motor for this regularly the shape and air connection configuration could have been set up to be more helpful that the one we have and it would be worth making a cradle that fits the motor and can be rested directly on pipes set into the tubes. Not worth the time and effort for us doing this once. But, if you were doing this regularly, you would have been a darn sight fitter and stronger than us!. And you would have been because, for many years, turning of the expander would, I suspect, have been by manual effort !. Nigel
#1.1 Nigel Bennett on 2013-04-14 18:08
From one geezer to another, I sure am glad I wasn't a boilermaker or boilermaker's helper in those days! On the other hand, I don't suppose many of those guys made it into their 60's and certainly not on the inside of a boiler? Out of morbid curiosity, though, reading the Trains article about the reflueing of the Grand Canyon Railway engine, what would it have cost to have a boiler company come in to do a similar flue fitting?
#1.1.1 c kronenwetter on 2013-04-14 20:45
Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.