Sunday, December 7. 2014Long delayed update
A lot of people have pointed out that it is an awfully long time since there was a Steam Department blog update. In my defense I plead that work in my role as Museum Treasurer has been nearly full time (sounds better that pleading idleness or incompetence!). So here we are, an update of several months of work in the department.
Doesn’t time fly!. It seems like only yesterday that we were working all night to get ready for the pre-season inspection. Now the operating season is over and the Winter work program is well under way. #1630 is back in the shop and we are busily crawling over and into her to so what must be done before next season.
It was a very successful season overall. We only missed one scheduled day due to mechanical problems. (Unfortunately Father’s Day when we had to fix a leaking valve).
It was rather challenging to begin with. She seemed to use a lot of coal to keep steam up but, once we reached fresh coal, she ran a great deal better. I guess it should not be a great surprise. Coal that has been lying around for years has lost quite a lot of the flammable material so you shovel a lot more for the same effect!.
Late in the season we had a scheduled weekend out of service and this provided the opportunity for a good clean. Aside from the usual coaling and watering, the boiler was drained and refilled with fresh water, the paintwork was washed and the rods cleaned and oiled.
After all the work she looked a lot better. The dust was gone from the top of the boiler but she is developing a “working” look as the condensation from the safety valves and generator slowly discolors the paint on the firebox sheet metal.
I fired the last two Sundays. That is quite an experience to really be part of the working locomotive after so long crawling in, over and around her as a dead object in the shop. #1630 certainly is different from other locomotives I have fired. I was working out that it is about 50 years since I first fired a locomotive (Prince on the Festiniog Railway). The box is a lot longer and wider than anything I have fired before. So a good deal more throwing. However, on the demonstration line, she is only running for a few minutes at a fraction of her real load capability. Very different from a small locomotive working flat out for a long time. You would certainly have extreme difficulty keeping up with #1630 if she had a full freight load behind her unless the stoker was operating. In museum service the trick is to achieve a relatively thin fire without any gaps when you are operating and not to have too much at the end of each run. Having a significant amount of hot fire when you get back to Union can lead to a noisy lay-over!.
So what has been going on in the shop and what is planned?. Obviously #1630 will be first priority for Winter work and a lot must be done this Winter to have her running for Memorial Day next year.
She is due for both the 30 day inspection and annual inspections which amount to quite a lot of work. The annual inspection requires the drawbars to be removed, checked and annealed. While the tender is separated and the drawbar removed, we will do the inspection and testing of the stays under the footplate. In addition we want to thoroughly examine the rear axle bearings and rods. There was a tendency to run warm in the rod bearings and more knocking than we would like. So the plan is strip, measure and carefully examine everything in this area and try to improve the running next year.
Before we could even start the work there were two busy weekends of preparation. First the locomotive had to be run on air to thoroughly remove water from all the steam system in case of any freezing during the Winter, Then there was the cleaning!. I missed the air running but was able to participate fully in the cleaning!. 3 hours with a high pressure hose in the firebox blowing soot out of the tubes is an experience to be missed if possible. The jokes of your “friends” when you emerge black from head to toe are also to be avoided!.
With this done she was moved into the shop and the locomotive and tender were separated. This provided some interesting views of the locomotive cab and the way in which the tender is attached. The center drawbar is spring loaded and is what pulls the tender and train. The two outer bars are a safety mechanism should the drawbar fail in service.
Above the drawbar can be seen the end of the auger of the stoker. This is turned by a steam motor in the tender (of which more anon) to drive coal along the large steel pipe from the tender to the locomotive. Looking again at the locomotive with part of the footplate removed you can see the way that the cast pipe carries the coal up toward the fire door.
In this view the fire-hole door has already been removed. This large casting would connect the end of the delivery chute to the fire-hole. Behind the closed door of the firebox, coal would be driven up the chute to the delivery plate where steam jets would throw it forward into the firebox.
After considerably more work, the delivery system and the central footplate had been removed to reveal the back of the firebox.
After several weekends of work to do this stripping the actual inspection that necessitates it took only a few hours. A group of flexible stays hidden behind the stoker delivery chute do not have telltale holes and, as such, must be inspected every 7 years. They all proved to be sound so that part of the inspection is done. Unfortunately we found quite a bit of rust in the supports of the footplate on the fireman’s side so Dennis will need to do some rebuilding before we put things back together.
Another job being progressed is the rebuilding of the stoker. This is not essential but we would like the stoker to be operational at least for demonstration purposes. It is not clear how useful it would be in museum service where we need only a thin but even fire. If it can be made to work we will find out!.
First stage is to remove the stoker motor. This is located behind a panel in the tender on the fireman’s side. Here it is being carefully eased out of the tender. This gives little idea of the effort that went into this exercise. It was an extremely tight fit and some modification of the hole was required to get it out with the fork lift. We suspect that it may previously have been fitted and removed on a greased plate so that it could be turned first one way then the other as the hole was not big enough for it to come thru directly.
Last weekend we carried out the last major stripping exercise. The locomotive was temporarily reattached to its tender so that it could be moved a few feet back and then forward. The objective is to remove the connecting rods between axles 4 and 5 to allow measurement and checking of the rod bearings and alignment of the two axles. The move is necessary because the pins in #4 axle are removed by driving them back thru the wheel between two spokes …. And you cannot remove the pins on both sides with the wheels in any single position!. Here Jason and Phil are removing the rod from the Fireman’s side. By7 end of day both rods were removed.
A lot of other work is in progress on 1630.
Most of the strays have now been opened up (removing the fireclay that seals them in service) and checked. (We must ensure each year that the telltale holes are open).
Both large air tanks have been removed and subjected to hammer and hydro testing. They are now ready for refitting.
Inspection of the air compressor is under way. The steam feed line has been removed and will be replaced. This line shows significant corrosion so the decision has been made to replace it.
At the end of the summer the tender and cab of #938 were repainted (Thank you Roger!). She now looks a lot better. In addition, Phil, JD and Brian removed the tubes from the boiler. This was largely an investigation exercise. We really had little idea of the condition of the boiler of this locomotive. The conclusion was that the interior of the boiler seems to be in reasonable condition so there would be no obvious barrier to rebuilding it. That does not indicate any likelihood that this will happen any time soon. The fact that the boiler appears reasonable indicates that it she is not a “no hoper”. Given the work that would be required, all we need is a dedicated Rock Island enthusiast with $500,000 or so burning a hole in his pocket and she could run again.
The second big focus has been the Shay and this will be our major project thru the Winter. The major jobs on the Shay are
Replacement of a number of firebox stays;
Rebuilding the front beam; and
Rebuilding the smokebox.
Once these are done, we can get on to the “more routine” jobs of re-tubing and re-assembling.
There is still some uncertainty over whether we will need to replace some stays behind the motor. This would require removing the motor and the bracket on which it sits, making the job rather bigger. While working to determine if the motor removal will be necessary we are progressing other work that is independent of this decision and ensuring that we are as ready as possible to do the motor removal if required.
Over the Summer:
The front truck has been prepared for remounting and placed back under the locomotive. This may not be permanent. Depending upon the need to lift the boiler we might need to pull it out again to fit the new bottom of the smokebox;
Everything under the locomotive was cleaned and painted before refitting the truck;
JD and Cody have been steadily removing stays that are identified as bad and in need of replacement (generally due to blockage of the tell-tale holes);
The parts for the front beam have been located and we are starting work on preparing these. The coupler and its mounting pocket have been moved down to the fabrication area for Jane to needle chip and wire brush. Once they have been examined for any cracks they can be painted and prepared for use;
David and I worked on the grease nipples in the drive shaft and couplings. First conclusion – a Shay has a LOT of these. All will need to be cleaned, checked and replaced if not working correctly;
Work was also starting on lapping all of the key steam valves. This led to the discovery that there were cracks in the face of the main turret valve. Clearly it was over tightened at some point. A new one will need to be made;
Work has also progressed steadily on #428
Dennis has been building up the axle boxes ready for machining. Unfortunately a problem developed with the planer and we are waiting for parts that will hopefully make this operational and ready to machine these axle boxes;
Work was also progressed on repairs to the frame that will allow the rear spacer to be refitted.
A great deal of machine work has been carried out to produce new parts that will allow the springs to be refitted.
Ed has been working steadily at refitting the pipework of the cab. This is an “interesting” exercise. It is a 3-D jigsaw of pipes of various diameters, shapes and end connections. I will post a photograph next time but he has achieved remarkable progress in turning what was a random jumble of pipework into a fitted backhead. It is all the more of a challenge as some of the pipes link to the air pump – which is not there to check if that is what a particular pipe should link to, and one or two seem to have been added to the pile from other locomotives!.
So, overall a lot has been done and there is much to be done in the next few months. If you are prepared to get your hands dirty, there is no shortage of work if we are to have 1630 back in service for the season and move forward with the Shay!.
I am now heading to the UK for Christmas so will be away for a few weeks and look forward to more progress when I get back and a busy Winter ahead in the Steam shop.
Nigel
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
So the 1630 is holed up for the entire winter while the restoration progress on the shay is processing onward. But why involve taking the old #938 to the workshop? I saw her at the door entrance that summer.
#1
Joshua Craig Beytien
on
2014-12-07 19:44
(Reply)
Holed up?.
1630 is our primary locomotive and is in the shop for a lot of essential work during the Winter. #938 was brought in for some cosmetic work while 1630 was out and running but the space she was in is that which 1630 occupies when we need to work on her.
Nigel
#1.1
Nigel Bennett
on
2014-12-07 19:53
(Reply)
The winter gives us time to properly inspect the locomotive for any defects during the last season. Plus, we won't be planning any winter operations anytime soon. While 938 was in the shop this year for cosmetic work, there is plenty of interest in restoring 938 to operational condition. However, a project like that may not happen until funds are made available and that other locomotive projects already in the steam department are completed.
#1.2
Trevor Palczynski
on
2014-12-07 21:52
(Reply)
Trevor,
Believe there is an element of realism to be injected here. A project like #938 would require quite a few man years of skilled work, either on-site or part contracted out. Starting such a project with volunteer efforts 1-2 days per week would be a recipe for a project that would run so long that it would never get completed.
As I noted in the blog, I believe that this could only become a project if we had donors prepared to come up with the big money needed to fund full time skilled working over a few years. Not impossible - look at the Electroliner. But I think we are kidding ourselves if we think it could be done on a casual basis and a couple of thousand dollars a year in donations.
Nigel
#1.2.1
Nigel Bennett
on
2014-12-08 09:01
(Reply)
Thanks Nigel for the insights into how much work is needed just to keep one steam locomotive operational. Even granted that the big railroads had staff and equipment to turn such repairs around quickly, it is easy to see why they dieselized as quickly as they did. This is also a good example I should think of why IRM doesn't want to have too many operating steam engines at one time? Think of having to do this annually with 4 or 5 such engines.
#2
c kronenwetter
on
2014-12-08 08:23
(Reply)
Yes. Steam is certainly labor intensive .... but worth it when you see it running.
I am with you on the implication on the number of locomotives. Current regulations demand a lot of annual work. Some you have to think is over kill. It is frustrating that we have to remove, hammer and hydro air tanks on a steam engine when the same tanks on a diesel do not require this. But we must follow the regs so it is done.
It almost certainly says that it would not be viable to have the number of operating locos that we did years ago. The annual work on a loco that ran few days was not as great then.
Nigel
#2.1
Nigel Bennett
on
2014-12-08 09:06
(Reply)
Certainly the 4 or 5 engine problem is something a lot of the railways in the UK have to deal with. We are very fortunate that the money available over here is such that the major railways normally have 3-6 locomotives available at any one time. Indeed I was reading last week that the North York Moors Railway is struggling for motive power as it only has 5 available locomotives (it needs that many just to run its regular service).
It would be great to come up with a way of getting that sort of money and allow engines such as 938 to run again.
#2.1.1
Michael Bennett
on
2014-12-17 03:30
(Reply)
Certainly a challenge but not really a like for like comparison.
The larger UK preserved railways are what the name implies - operating railways, often 10+ miles in length and running the service is the core activity of the organization. In contrast IRM is a museum (with arguably the largest collection in the US) and runs a demonstration line to allow some of the equipment to be seen operating.
Also, many of the UK lines are primarily steam while IRM also has substantial diesel and electric collections. So our total list of operable equipment (between which running days must be shared) is much more than 5 items.
Nigel
#2.1.1.1
Nigel Bennett
on
2014-12-18 10:33
(Reply)
Wow you guys run a tight ship. Most of the museums out here in Pennsylvania are run down and full of rotting engines. I still hold out hope though that a group like you or Strasbourg can take over East Broad Top and turn it into some spectacular. I remember my parents taking me to the museum about 14 years ago; and I'm planning a summer road trip to see the museum again this coming year.
#3
Crazy Harry
on
2014-12-21 15:20
(Reply)
if i remember correctly, i remember hearing one of the volunteers saying that 428, in general, could operate on both the museum line and public rails because its a proportional size, if the price is right. am i forgetting something? and what other engines could operate on both rails?
#4
Raffi
on
2014-12-26 19:57
(Reply)
Will the Steam shop have a work day on Sunday, 01/04/2015? If so, what time do you guys meet, and if I wanted to volunteer, what should I bring?
Thanks,
Tom
#5
Tom W
on
2015-01-01 13:37
(Reply)
Will the pipes that are being installed on the backhead of 428 need to be removed for when it comes time for the cab to be refitted? Also do the pipes need to be replaced or is this just the time to figure out where they go and to determine if they are usable or need to be replaced?
#6
Logan
on
2015-01-02 20:39
(Reply)
Add Comment
|
Blog AdministrationCategory TreeCalendar
QuicksearchCommentsEthan Armitage about A brief history of 9976 Mon, 09-08-2025 08:22 Good job on the Burlington Nortern 9976. OK. Jamie Kolanowski about New Acquisation: What is CN 15444? Tue, 08-12-2025 12:56 No new news that I have heard of thus far. Jamie Kolanowski about Burlington Northern 9908 body work Tue, 08-12-2025 12:53 I'll also be doing another update on it soon. Keep en eye out for that. Jamie Kolanowski about Burlington Northern 9908 body work Tue, 08-12-2025 12:47 A little work was done to it for Diesel Days this year. You'll see photos floating around for the temporary short term job that was done to make it [...] Johncrpenter about New Acquisation: What is CN 15444? Wed, 08-06-2025 13:01 Is steam car CN 15444 going to be coming to museum several times it was to be moved to muesum Lincoln Strickland about New Acquisation: What is CN 15444? Sat, 07-19-2025 18:56 Yeah, sadly it's still there as of 7/19/2025 Nick about Burlington Northern 9908 body work Thu, 06-12-2025 19:14 Its been 14 years guys, where is the unit? Like really? Did you guys misplace it? Or are repairs taking that long? At this point be might we will have [...] Steve Smedley about Milwaukee Road 33C update 3/23/2020 Wed, 04-09-2025 17:40 Jamie Thanks for the update. She's gonna shine like every thing else you guys do! Smeds James Kolanowski about Diesel Shop update 3/5/2025 Thu, 03-06-2025 16:28 Yes, there is a wye. Those two have been MU'ed on diesel days a year or two ago. Joe S about Diesel Shop update 3/5/2025 Wed, 03-05-2025 14:04 7009 number boards look good. Is there a way to turn a locomotive around at IRM? In case you ever had a mind to connect 7009 and 6847? James Kolanowski about Milwaukee Road 33C update Fri, 03-29-2024 21:26 We're slackers and spend more time working on the equipment in the shop than keeping all you readers updated. We'll work on it, but I'm sure updates [...] AJ about Milwaukee Road 33C update Thu, 03-14-2024 08:02 What happened to the Department Blog? It's been over 2 years and I still regularly check for updates, but nothing comes... Syndicate This Blog |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Powered by s9y.